Judging Criteria
-
Judges will consider:
-
Action & leadership: What has this individual actively done to support mental health?
-
Impact on others: How have colleagues, teams or communities benefited?
-
Advocacy & culture: How has this person challenged stigma or influenced culture?
-
Authenticity: Evidence of genuine care, commitment or lived experience.
-
-
Judges will consider:
-
The idea: What is the innovation and why is it different?
-
Mental health impact: How has it improved wellbeing or reduced risk?
-
Practical application: How has it been implemented in real settings?
-
Evidence: Feedback, outcomes or examples showing it works.
-
-
Judges will consider:
-
Quality of training: What was delivered and to whom?
-
Relevance: How well does it meet real mental health needs?
-
Reach & engagement: Who took part and how widely was it adopted?
-
Impact: How has learning translated into confidence, skills or behaviour change?
-
Judges will consider:
-
Inclusive action: What specific actions reduced barriers or supported inclusion?
-
Mental health outcomes: How did these actions improve wellbeing or psychological safety?
-
Lived experience: Evidence of listening to and supporting underrepresented voices.
-
Culture change: How inclusion has shaped everyday workplace experiences.
-
Judges will consider:
-
Workplace culture: How wellbeing shows up day to day.
-
Support in practice: What support is available and how it’s used.
-
Employee voice: Evidence of engagement, feedback or testimonials.
-
Consistency: How wellbeing is embedded, not just reactive.
-
-
Judges will consider:
-
People-first culture: How employees are supported across the business.
-
Mental health initiatives: Practical steps taken to improve wellbeing.
-
Leadership commitment: How wellbeing is prioritised and modelled.
-
Impact: Evidence of positive outcomes for staff.
-
Judges will consider:
-
Creativity & clarity: How engaging and accessible the campaign or event was.
-
Reach & engagement: Who it reached and how people responded.
-
Mental health focus: How clearly it addressed mental health or stigma.
-
Impact: Evidence of awareness raised, behaviour change or action taken.
Judges will consider:
-
Leadership & initiative: What the individual has led or influenced.
-
Advocacy: How they have supported peers or promoted mental health.
-
Impact: Evidence of change, engagement or inspiration.
-
Potential: Signs of future leadership and continued commitment.
Judges will consider:
-
Contribution: How the nominee has supported mental health in hospitality.
-
Collaboration: How they have worked with others to amplify impact.
-
Reach & influence: Who benefited from their support or advocacy.
-
Alignment: How their actions align with the values of the hospitality sector.